Tuesday’s presentations discussed the Developing, Implementing & Teaching Hazard Assessment Tools from a variety of points of view, including their impact on lab safety culture; their role as an information and educational process in the laboratory; and how institutions can provide oversight of the quality of this work.
The afternoon session was a 3 hour workshop that discussed how the Bowtie Methodology to hazard and incident analysis can be applied in the laboratory sessions through several examples worked through in small groups.
Creating a Culture of Safety: APLU Recommendations and Tools for Universities and Colleges. K. Jeskie
Parsing the Chemical Risk Assessment Process for the Laboratory. R. Stuart
Incorporating Hazard Assessment into Laboratory Curricula: One Pathway to Growing a Sustainable Safety Culture. L.J. Tirri
A Remarkable Advance in Lab Coats for Chemical Exposure Prevention C.A. Merlic
Software Tools to Assist and Promote Laboratory Safety. C.A. Merlic, S.M. Hussain
Using Case Studies and Receving Ancillary Benefits Through Instruction and Use of What-If Hazard Reviews in an Academic Research Environment. K.W. Kretchman
System to identify, analyze and control the hazards of laboratory researcher at Argonne National Laboratory. S. Baumann, S. Rupkey
Hazard Review and Approval System at the National Institute of Standards and Technology. S.G. Ringen
Development of a database for hazard assessment and work approval in the Material Measurement Laboratory at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). E. Mackey, C. Vogel, B. Brass
Introduction to Bowtie Methodology for a Laboratory Setting. C. Boylan, M.B. Mulcahy
